13 International Speakers + SMX Sydney Agenda now “Live”

Three things to let you know about today,

1. Thirteen International Speakers Announced, see below.
2. Full SMX Sydney agenda now online – Check it out here
3. 25% Discount still valid – Use this link to book, offer ends @ the ends March 30, 2012, so hurry.

International Speakers

Today we are announcing the 13 of our confirmed international speakers, we pride ourselves on both the quality of content and speakers. 2012 is a landmark year for us as we have our largest contingent of International speakers ever – 14 in all, 13 of those are listed below with the last one to be announced shortly.

PrintFriendly

SMX Sydney 2012 Agenda Overview Now Online

This week we are announcing the complete agenda for SMX Sydney 2012, but as we are waiting on a new agenda technology to bed down we have to simply give you an overview.

Check the SMX Sydney 2012 agenda overview.

PrintFriendly

40 reasons to attend SMX Sydney in 2012

Register for SMX Sydney 2011

Yesterday Google released a blog post by Amit Sinhgal, Senior VP and Google Fellow, for those of you who are unaware of who Amit is, Amit is the head of the Google Search Quality Team .

In this post he outlines a record number of improvements to Google’s search quality with forty different updates listed, in the post he says that Google is continuing to improve many of the systems, including;

  • Related searches
  • Sitelinks
  • Autocomplete
  • UI elements
  • Indexing
  • Synonyms
  • SafeSearch and more.

Each individual change is subtle and important, and over time they will add up to a radically improved search engine. Matt McGee over at SMX Sydney’s partner site Searchengineland.com has summed it up very well and there is a great “Infographic” to look at as well that tracks Panda one year after the initial update.

We have some of the brightest minds in search coming out this year and we have already announced four of our international speakers and we have another eight to go!

Already announced:

So, with all these changes happening on just one search engine do you really think you can afford to miss out on Australia’s most trusted Search marketing event in Sydney this year?

Grab your tickets now before the great 35% discount offers end this afternoon @ 5pm AEST.

Register for SMX Sydney 2011

PrintFriendly

Infographic: The Google Panda Update, One Year Later

Special thanks goes to Searchengineland.com & Blueglass Interactive for the info graphic, the original article can be found here

One year ago, Google launched its “Panda Update” designed to filter low quality or “thin” content from its top search results.

Below, our infographic produced in conjunction with BlueGlass covers how Panda works, what it impacted and the various updates from Panda 1.0 through Panda 3.2 that have happened along the way.

After the infographic, you’ll also find more information about the Panda Update ranging from in-depth analysis of how it works, “winners and losers” and well as recovery tips.

Learn More!

Want to learn more about the Panda Update and some of the things mentioned on the chart? Below is a great list of articles from Searchengineland.com.

Panda: The Timeline

Panda: In-Depth Analysis

Panda: Winners & Losers

Panda: Recovery Tips

More SEO Information

PrintFriendly

Google Confirms Panda 3.3 Update, Plus Changes To How It Evaluates Links, Local Search Rankings & Much More

by , over at SMX Sydney’s partner site – Searchengineland.com

Google has confirmed a new Panda update at the same time that it’s announcing 40 search updates that happened in February (or are in progress right now).

It would be all but impossible to fully sum up the full slate of changes here, but there are a few that seem especially noteworthy and will no doubt produce a lot of speculation among search marketers. Here’s a look at the ones that stand out to me:

Panda 3.3 Update

Here’s what Google says about its latest Panda-related change:

Panda update. This launch refreshes data in the Panda system, making it more accurate and more sensitive to recent changes on the web.

This sounds very similar to Panda 3.2, which happened in mid-January and was described only as a “data refresh” and not related to new or changed ranking signals.

Panda was launched a year ago — don’t miss the full background in our recent story, Infographic: The Google Panda Update, One Year Later.

Postscript, Feb. 28th: Google tells us that the Panda data update took place yesterday, February 27th. The company declined to share any additional information about the “link evaluation” item below.

Evaluating Links

Google says it’s getting rid of a link evaluation signal that it’s been using for years. This one’s sure to prompt discussion:

Link evaluation. We often use characteristics of links to help us figure out the topic of a linked page. We have changed the way in which we evaluate links; in particular, we are turning off a method of link analysis that we used for several years. We often rearchitect or turn off parts of our scoring in order to keep our system maintainable, clean and understandable.

We’ve reached out to Google in the past, asking for further clarification on the items in these monthly roundups. The company has indicated that the blog post says everything Google wants to say. That, along with Google’s understandable (and necessary) reluctance to give away too many details about ranking signals, leads me to assume we won’t be getting anything more than the above about this.

A link evaluation signal that’s been used for years is now turned off? The SEO mind races….

Local Search Rankings

Here’s another one, along with the link evaluation signal, that I’m actually surprised Google would so openly reveal. The company says traditional algorithmic ranking factors are now playing a bigger part in triggering local search results:

Improvements to ranking for local search results. [launch codename “Venice”] This improvement improves the triggering of Local Universal results by relying more on the ranking of our main search results as a signal.

Traditional SEO has played a bigger part in Google’s local search since the launch of Places Search in late 2010. And now it sounds like that dial is being turned up a little higher, too.

Google’s post also says local results are being improved because of a “new system to find results from a user’s city more reliably. Now we’re better able to detect when both queries and documents are local to the user.”

Other Google Updates

As I said, it’s impossible to recap the entire Google blog post. In addition to the items above, you might pay attention to these items:

  • More accurate detection of official pages
  • Expand the size of our images index in Universal Search
  • “Site:” query update
  • International launch of shopping rich snippets

There are also several updates related to freshness, sitelinks and related searches.

PrintFriendly

Google Search quality highlights: 40 changes for February

Posted by Amit Singhal, Senior VP and Google Fellow on the Google Inside Search blog.

This month we have many improvements to celebrate. With 40 changes reported, that marks a new record for our monthly series on search quality. Most of the updates rolled out earlier this month, and a handful are actually rolling out today and tomorrow. We continue to improve many of our systems, including related searches, sitelinks, autocomplete, UI elements, indexing, synonyms, SafeSearch and more. Each individual change is subtle and important, and over time they add up to a radically improved search engine.

Here’s the list for February:

  • More coverage for related searches. [launch codename “Fuzhou”] This launch brings in a new data source to help generate the “Searches related to” section, increasing coverage significantly so the feature will appear for more queries. This section contains search queries that can help you refine what you’re searching for.
  • Tweak to categorizer for expanded sitelinks. [launch codename “Snippy”, project codename “Megasitelinks”] This improvement adjusts a signal we use to try and identify duplicate snippets. We were applying a categorizer that wasn’t performing well for our expanded sitelinks, so we’ve stopped applying the categorizer in those cases. The result is more relevant sitelinks.
  • Less duplication in expanded sitelinks. [launch codename “thanksgiving”, project codename “Megasitelinks”] We’ve adjusted signals to reduce duplication in the snippets forexpanded sitelinks. Now we generate relevant snippets based more on the page content and less on the query.
  • More consistent thumbnail sizes on results page. We’ve adjusted the thumbnail size for most image content appearing on the results page, providing a more consistent experience across result types, and also across mobile and tablet. The new sizes apply to rich snippet results for recipes and applications, movie posters, shopping results, book results, news results and more.
  • More locally relevant predictions in YouTube. [project codename “Suggest”] We’ve improved the ranking for predictions in YouTube to provide more locally relevant queries. For example, for the query [lady gaga in ] performed on the US version of YouTube, we might predict [lady gaga in times square], but for the same search performed on the Indian version of YouTube, we might predict [lady gaga in India].
  • More accurate detection of official pages. [launch codename “WRE”] We’ve made an adjustment to how we detect official pages to make more accurate identifications. The result is that many pages that were previously misidentified as official will no longer be.
  • Refreshed per-URL country information. [Launch codename “longdew”, project codename “country-id data refresh”] We updated the country associations for URLs to use more recent data.
  • Expand the size of our images index in Universal Search. [launch codename “terra”, project codename “Images Universal”] We launched a change to expand the corpus of results for which we show images in Universal Search. This is especially helpful to give more relevant images on a larger set of searches.
  • Minor tuning of autocomplete policy algorithms. [project codename “Suggest”] We have a narrow set of policies for autocomplete for offensive and inappropriate terms. This improvement continues to refine the algorithms we use to implement these policies.
  • “Site:” query update [launch codename “Semicolon”, project codename “Dice”] This change improves the ranking for queries using the “site:” operator by increasing the diversity of results.
  • Improved detection for SafeSearch in Image Search. [launch codename "Michandro", project codename “SafeSearch”] This change improves our signals for detecting adult content in Image Search, aligning the signals more closely with the signals we use for our other search results.
  • Interval based history tracking for indexing. [project codename “Intervals”] This improvement changes the signals we use in document tracking algorithms.
  • Improvements to foreign language synonyms. [launch codename “floating context synonyms”, project codename “Synonyms”] This change applies an improvement we previously launched for English to all other languages. The net impact is that you’ll more often find relevant pages that include synonyms for your query terms.
  • Disabling two old fresh query classifiers. [launch codename “Mango”, project codename “Freshness”] As search evolves and new signals and classifiers are applied to rank search results, sometimes old algorithms get outdated. This improvement disables two old classifiers related to query freshness.
  • More organized search results for Google Korea. [launch codename “smoothieking”, project codename “Sokoban4”] This significant improvement to search in Korea better organizes the search results into sections for news, blogs and homepages.
  • Fresher images. [launch codename “tumeric”] We’ve adjusted our signals for surfacing fresh images. Now we can more often surface fresh images when they appear on the web.
  • Update to the Google bar. [project codename “Kennedy”] We continue to iterate in our efforts to deliver a beautifully simple experience across Google products, and as part of that this month we made further adjustments to the Google bar. The biggest change is that we’ve replaced the drop-down Google menu in the November redesign with a consistent and expanded set of links running across the top of the page.
  • Adding three new languages to classifier related to error pages. [launch codename "PNI", project codename "Soft404"] We have signals designed to detect crypto 404 pages (also known as “soft 404s”), pages that return valid text to a browser but the text only contain error messages, such as “Page not found.” It’s rare that a user will be looking for such a page, so it’s important we be able to detect them. This change extends a particular classifier to Portuguese, Dutch and Italian.
  • Improvements to travel-related searches. [launch codename “nesehorn”] We’ve made improvements to triggering for a variety of flight-related search queries. These changes improve the user experience for our Flight Search feature with users getting more accurate flight results.
  • Data refresh for related searches signal. [launch codename “Chicago”, project codename “Related Search”] One of the many signals we look at to generate the “Searches related to” section is the queries users type in succession. If users very often search for [apple] right after [banana], that’s a sign the two might be related. This update refreshes the model we use to generate these refinements, leading to more relevant queries to try.
  • International launch of shopping rich snippets. [project codename “rich snippets”]Shopping rich snippets help you more quickly identify which sites are likely to have the most relevant product for your needs, highlighting product prices, availability, ratings and review counts. This month we expanded shopping rich snippets globally (they were previously only available in the US, Japan and Germany).
  • Improvements to Korean spelling. This launch improves spelling corrections when the user performs a Korean query in the wrong keyboard mode (also known as an “IME”, or input method editor). Specifically, this change helps users who mistakenly enter Hangul queries in Latin mode or vice-versa.
  • Improvements to freshness. [launch codename “iotfreshweb”, project codename “Freshness”] We’ve applied new signals which help us surface fresh content in our results even more quickly than before.
  • Web History in 20 new countries. With Web History, you can browse and search over your search history and webpages you’ve visited. You will also get personalized search results that are more relevant to you, based on what you’ve searched for and which sites you’ve visited in the past. In order to deliver more relevant and personalized search results, we’ve launched Web History in Malaysia, Pakistan, Philippines, Morocco, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Estonia, Kuwait, Iraq, Sri Lanka, Tunisia, Nigeria, Lebanon, Luxembourg, Bosnia and Herzegowina, Azerbaijan, Jamaica, Trinidad and Tobago, Republic of Moldova, and Ghana. Web History is turned on only for people who have a Google Account and previously enabled Web History.
  • Improved snippets for video channels. Some search results are links to channels with many different videos, whether on mtv.com, Hulu or YouTube. We’ve had a feature for a while now that displays snippets for these results including direct links to the videos in the channel, and this improvement increases quality and expands coverage of these rich “decorated” snippets. We’ve also made some improvements to our backends used to generate the snippets.
  • Improvements to ranking for local search results. [launch codename “Venice”] This improvement improves the triggering of Local Universal results by relying more on the ranking of our main search results as a signal.
  • Improvements to English spell correction. [launch codename “Kamehameha”] This change improves spelling correction quality in English, especially for rare queries, by making one of our scoring functions more accurate.
  • Improvements to coverage of News Universal. [launch codename “final destination”] We’ve fixed a bug that caused News Universal results not to appear in cases when our testing indicates they’d be very useful.
  • Consolidation of signals for spiking topics. [launch codename “news deserving score”, project codename “Freshness”] We use a number of signals to detect when a new topic is spiking in popularity. This change consolidates some of the signals so we can rely on signals we can compute in realtime, rather than signals that need to be processed offline. This eliminates redundancy in our systems and helps to ensure we can continue to detect spiking topics as quickly as possible.
  • Better triggering for Turkish weather search feature. [launch codename “hava”] We’ve tuned the signals we use to decide when to present Turkish users with the weather search feature. The result is that we’re able to provide our users with the weather forecast right on the results page with more frequency and accuracy.
  • Visual refresh to account settings page. We completed a visual refresh of the account settings page, making the page more consistent with the rest of our constantly evolving design.
  • Panda update. This launch refreshes data in the Panda system, making it more accurate and more sensitive to recent changes on the web.
  • Link evaluation. We often use characteristics of links to help us figure out the topic of a linked page. We have changed the way in which we evaluate links; in particular, we are turning off a method of link analysis that we used for several years. We often rearchitect or turn off parts of our scoring in order to keep our system maintainable, clean and understandable.
  • SafeSearch update. We have updated how we deal with adult content, making it more accurate and robust. Now, irrelevant adult content is less likely to show up for many queries.
  • Spam update. In the process of investigating some potential spam, we found and fixed some weaknesses in our spam protections.
  • Improved local results. We launched a new system to find results from a user’s city more reliably. Now we’re better able to detect when both queries and documents are local to the user.
PrintFriendly

How to Optimize Your Site for Google in Foreign Countries

As with SEO in your own language, attention to the basics pays off. Just as you would do when working in your own country, when working outside your home country and language be sure to build your site with algorithm-friendly architecture, load it with relevant content, and attract inbound links from authoritative sites. Now let’s look at the particular spin that search marketing overseas puts on the tactics you know.

1. Build Country-Specific Website Architecture

Successful SEO starts with search-friendly architecture on your site, and this is equally as true for your foreign language sites as your home site. Of course, you know you can’t rank well and receive traffic that converts if your site is not in Google’s index, and this is just as important for websites targeting other countries than your home.

Duplicate content can become an issue and cause you to be filtered out of the appropriate index, especially when a single language is replicated across a number of pages with different country code domains. If you are using content in the same language across a number of specific country sites, be sure to map each site to its intended country in your Google Webmaster Tools account, and obtain high-quality links from each country to its targeted content to point the way to your intended users.

Use unique page titles and directory URLs in the specific language of each country you are targeting. As with your home language site, unique page titles and URLs that accurately describe the content specific to each page help spiders find, index, and rank your content, as well as attract clicks from traffic looking for it.

2. Use Your Audience’s Language on your Site

Write your content in the language of your intended visitors. While this may seem obvious, many websites are seeking to do business using their English content. Even in countries where English is the official language, local vocabulary and usage varies. This issue becomes even more complicated when a site is in Spanish or German or French, as there may be significant and confusing differences in the local versions of these languages.  The language on your website sends a strong signal to Google about where to display it in search results.

Avoid using page templates that default to English content where no local language content is available. This shortcut for building country-specific pages causes confusion in targeted country detection, and much of your content will be devalued by duplicate content filters. Moreover, providing only English content to foreign language readers certainly falls short of speaking your customers’ language and reduces your marketing effectiveness.

3. Attract Links from the Country You Are Targeting

For your offshore domains, the most effective links are ones from high-quality sites in the individual countries you are targeting. Your site in France should have links from sites in France with an .fr domain, whereas your sites in Argentina should have links from sites in Argentina with an .ar domain, and so forth.

On a site in a language used in more than one country, such as German or Spanish, using inbound links is a good way to provide clarifying endorsements from the intended country. A German-language page with links to it from sites on “.de” domains or the “.de” directory is more likely to rank well and be seen in Google results in Germany than in Austria, even if the language is the same.

Without such links, Google determines where to show the results based on the domain name (or subdirectories or subdomains), language, and Google Webmaster Tools mapping. However, if the language is the same on both German and Austrian sites, a significant indicator is no longer clear to Google. Although Google Webmaster Tools mapping may help you avoid one or the other being filtered out of the index as a duplicate, your ranking and visibility will be much better with the added indicator of links from target countries.

The Open Directory Project (AKA Dmoz.org) has country-specific listings in many categories, further cross-referenced to other languages for the same category. You can find potential linking sources by searching Dmoz listings for your target country and reviewing the sites in it. Dmoz has 1.9 million listings in 46 languages, besides English, from Afrikaans to Ukrainian. You can find a complete list atwww.dmoz.org/World.

You can also find possible links partners on Google by performing a wildcard (*) search for “web directory site*” using your target country extension to search. You need to filter out Google results by specifying “-Google” in your query. To search for sites in Argentina, your query would be “www.web directory site:*.com.ar -Google” and would produce lists of directories in that country.

Use Google Translate to find your way around results when you are not familiar with the language, but be sure to have someone who is familiar with the language check over the findings.

4. Optimize for Universal Search Results Pages

Search results page on Google Egypt
As this sample search results page from Google Egypt illustrates, images, and maps gain greater visibility above the fold.

Google displays many forms of content on its results pages in almost all countries worldwide, including video and images, so do not overlook optimizing those important elements on your site. Keep in mind that techniques for optimizing for YouTube are different than techniques for optimizing for Google. In the United States, optimizing images and videos is still often overlooked as an effective way to get content into search engine results pages; this is also true in other countries, as you can see in the screen shot below. This oversight gives you many opportunities to increase visibility for more of your content and outpace your competitors.

Global Search Engine Marketing: Getting Better Search Engine Results Around the World (Que, 2012), by Anne F. Kennedy and Kristjan Mar HaukssonAnne F. Kennedy is an international search strategist and the founder of US-based Beyond Ink USA, Her company has international partners in Iceland, China, Denmark, Italy, Sweden, and the UK. This article is based on her book: Anne F. Kennedy and Kristjan Mar Hauksson,Global Search Engine Marketing (Que, January 2012).

PrintFriendly

Interview with Andreas Pinto, Head of Business Development – Firstrate

In this interview with Andreas he tells us why Firstrate continue to Exhibit at Online Marketer and gives you some feedback on the content of the two major parts of the event – Search Marketing Expo & eMetrics marketing Optimization Summit.

PrintFriendly

Online Marketer Sydney 2012 – 2nd speaker announcement

Today we are announcing two more of our twelve confirmed international speakers. Both of our speakers we are announcing today are coming to our Sydney event for the very first time.

The first Speaker we would like to welcome into the Online Marketer family is Christine Churchill of KeyRelevance which is based in Texas. Those of you that have been in search marketing for a few years will recognise Christine’s name, Christine has over ten years experience in online marketing and is a regular speaker at Search Marketing Expo in the US. Her expertise includes Keyword Research, Paid Search, quite an array of skills.

There is a great interview with Christine thats worth a read over at SEOChicks or watch this video that gives you a nice insight into the way Christine presents.

Our second international speaker to be announced today is Michael King, Michael’s expertise includes SEO, Integrated Search, Conversion Rate Optimization, Social Media Marketing, Digital Brand Strategy, Analytics & Music Marketing.

To get an idea of Mike’s style you read this great piece written on Scrape Rate and Shareability Rates.

We have Christine & Mike scheduled to speak on a wide variety of topics at Search Marketing Expo, eMetrics Marketing Optimization Summit, Social Marketer Workshop and the Advanced SEO Workshop.

All in all there will be seven events to choose from, ranging from the basics at Boot-Camp right through to hard core SEO with the Elite SEO Workshop.

Here are few useful links:

Last but not least, a deal!

You can continue to get our Pre-Agenda Early bird discount of 35% off any of our event option by simply booking before the end of February.

Stay tuned for our next International Speaker announcements coming up next week.

Bye for now

Barry Smyth

PrintFriendly

Scrape Rate and Shareability Rate

As I tweeted about a month ago my top draft picks for relatively unknown SEOs that are about to make tsunamis for 2012 are Dan Shure (@dan_shure) and Jon Cooper (@pointblankseo). Both of whom are not taking that declaration lightly and have come out swinging. Last week Jon Cooper invented a new metric for guest post prospecting called Scrape Rate and I’m going to build upon that a little bit here.

The basic premise is that posts on many popular blogs are scraped and placed and/or syndicated onto other websites and therefore writing a guest post containing one link back to a given sitewill have a multiplier effect once the post goes live and is scraped. This is something that I’ve noticed in the past in writing for SEOmoz. As seen below there are 103 pages that have scraped and republished the “Just How Smart are Search Robots” post that I wrote at the end of November 2011.

Intitle SERP example

And for that reason alone I am on the first page (between 7 and 9 depending) for the keyword “Googlebot,” a highly competitive keyword according to Moz’s Keyword Difficulty Report.

It’s pretty safe to say that this is very powerful stuff that should be weighed when considering where to guest post.

Shareability Rate (or Share Rate)

Immediately after seeing Jon’s post I thought “this is brilliant but why aren’t we computing this for the propensity of posts on a given site to be shared.” For example as soon as a post goes live on the main blog of SEOmoz there are roughly 300 tweets immediately no matter what due to their devoted following and RSS scrapers.

For example Andrew’s post went up sometime early this afternoon and already has 537 tweets.

Computing Share Rate

I skipped the explanation of how to compute scrape rate with good reason; shareability rate will play into what I believe to the most effective way to compute scrape rate.

Share metrics are available via free APIs and or even directly in Excel via Neil Bosma’s SeoTools plugin and therefore are far easier to come by than Google results numbers. So while Jon suggested that you pull 3 random URLs in computing scrape rate, I’m going to suggest something more empirical. We’re going to pulls all the URLs for the section of the site that we want to guest post on and then pull social metrics on all of those URLs and then calculate an average of all the social metrics for those URLs. For speed and simplicity of creating this post I’m using 11 URLs from the SEOmoz blog.

  1. Download and Install Neil Bosma’s SeoTools – That is if you haven’t already.
  2. Download the XML Sitemap
  3. Open the XML Sitemap in Excel – Hat tip to Justin Briggs for this one. I had no idea that Excel opened and properly formatted XML files.
  4. Pull the Facebook Likes, Google Plus Ones, and Tweet Counts for each URL. The functions are =FacebookLikes(), TwitterCount() and =GooglePlusCount().

  5. Sort the values from lowest to highest – this is important later for computing Scrape Rate.
  6. Calculate the average of each
  7. Calculate the average of the averages
Voila, we’ve determined that on average across Google+, Facebook and Twitter a guest post for this example set will get 142 social shares. Note: This is just an example, not the actual Share Rate of an SEOmoz blog post.

Computing Scrape Rate

Jon talks about pulling 3 random URLs in order to determine the Scrape Rate. While this is a good quick and dirty judge of the Scrape Rate it’s not empirical. That is to say without a more empirical approach you may end up getting a Scrape Rate that isn’t truly indicative of the site’s propensity to be scraped. This is where Share Rate can inform the Scrape Rate. Using the share counts as an indication of popularity allows you to weigh the importance of pages and therefore you can get a better Scrape Rate by taking average of the 3 pages at the mean of the Share Rate.

  1. Find the median of the URL list. So if there are 200 URLs the median is 100th URL.
  2. Pull the median URL, the URL preceding and the URL following.
  3. Pull the page titles for these 3 pages using =HtmlTitle() in SeoTools.
  4. Run “intitle:” queries with these 3 page titles and record the number of results Google returns. Note: SeoTools has a function for pulling the number of Results (=GoogleResultCount) but I couldn’t get it to work properly with concatenate and and intitle query.
  5. Take an average of these numbers.

Voila, we have an empirical Scrape Rate!

Conclusion

Guest posting takes a lot of time and effort and you always want to get the most bang for your buck. Scrape Rate and Share Rate are great metrics for determining how worth your while it will be to write a guest post on a given site. As always you know I’m not into all this manual labor for computing something like this so you know I’m already working on a tool… Stay tuned.

As always your thoughts and feedback is appreciated. Also big shout out to Jon Cooper on his great work!

Happy guest posting!

PrintFriendly